Chintu @ Chitesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22462 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2024 Thana- AMNAUR District- Saran ====================================================== Chintu @ Chitesh Kumar Singh S/O Hareshwar Kumar Singh R/O VillageParshurampur (Parasrampur), P.S- Amnour, Distt.- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, Sr. Advocate Mr.Dewendra Narayan Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh, APP For the Informant :

Mr.Saubhagya Suman, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-04-2026 Heard the parties.

2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Amnour P.S. Case No. 150 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 363, 365 of the I.P.C. and later added Section 302, 120(B) & 201 of the I.P.C. Earlier the prayer for bail was rejected on 17.01.2025 by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 73738/2024.

3. As per the prosecution case on 16.05.2024 in the night the informant's son Alok Kumar Singh and his friend Rishabh Kumar came at the shop of the informant, took a bottle of cold drink, left on a motorcycle but till late night the informant's son did not return. During search, the informant went to the house of Rishabh Kumar and asked about his son's

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22462 of 2026(2) dt.30-04-2026 2/2 whereabouts and he was told by Rishabh Kumar that he had dropped the deceased on way and he does not know anything further in this regard. The dead body of the informant's son was found buried in an orchard.

4. It has been submitted by the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner that the case has been committed and even the charge has not been framed.

5. Learned counsel for the informant has reiterated his earlier arguments and has relied upon the order passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court earlier.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, this Court finds no ground to review its earlier order.

7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed again with direction to the concerned court below to expedite the trial and frame the charges at the earliest and thereafter the prosecution will examine the witnesses and if the trial is delayed by the prosecution, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. (Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T