← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23212/2024bail granted

Anshu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-02Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23212 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2023 Thana- DAWATH District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Anshu Kumari Daughter of Jaimangal Sharma Resident of VillageBabhnaul, P.S.- Dawath, District- Rohtas, Bihar 2.

Ritu Kumari @ Reetu Vishwkarma Daughter of Jaimangal Sharma Resident of Village- Babhnaul, P.S.- Dawath, District- Rohtas, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate Mr. Netan Chouhan, Advocate For the Informant :

Mr. Gopal Krishana Nishant, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 02-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Dawath P.S Case No. 121 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B, 201, 34 of Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, it is a case of dowry death due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely been implicated in this case. It also submitted that petitioners are sisters-in-laws of the daughter of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23212 of 2024(3) dt.02-08-2024 2/2 the informant and there is no specific allegation of demand of dowry and torture has been made against the petitioners. Petitioners are girls of marriageable age. They are preparing for competitive examinations. Dead body of the deceased is already disposed off due to which postmortem was not conducted. It is next submitted that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made on behalf of the petitioners, let the above named petitioner be released on bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the trial court within a period of six weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-I, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Dawath P.S Case No. 121 of 2023 subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Mayank/- U T