Muskan Ansari @ Shahnaz Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20200 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-602 Year-2024 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== Muskan Ansari @ Shahnaz Hussain son of Najir Ansari VILL- RAI SIRSA PS -BHELDI DISTT -SARAN AT CHAPRA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-04-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 23.09.2024, while informant along with his friend went to market, F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner and one unknown person were fighting with some boys and thereafter, co-accused Asgar Ansari fired from his Katta which hit left leg of informant and he got injured.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. From bare perusal of the F.I.R. it is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20200 of 2025(2) dt.21-04-2025 2/2 apparent that specific accusation of causing fire arm injury is against co-accused Asgar Ansari. So far as this petitioner is concerned, there are general and omnibus allegations and there is no specific accusation of overt act against her and she is only alleged to be present at the place of occurrence. Petitioner is a lady and claims clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the general and omnibus nature of accusation and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-4, Saran at Chapra in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 602 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T