Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52512/2016bail granted

Vijay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-12-13Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52512 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -180 Year- 2016 Thana -PATNA CITY CHOWK District- PATNA ============================================= Vijay Yadav, son of Sakal Rai @ Chandradeep Rai, resident of Mohalla - Kaimasikoh (Chamdoria) P.S. Chowk, Dist - Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ============================================= Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Bindeshwar Prasad Singh, Advocate. Mr. Rudra Deo, Advocate.

For the State : Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha, A.P.P. ============================================= CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 13-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 26.09.2016 in connection with Chowk P.S. Case No. 180 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 272, 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 47(a), 50, 51, 53, 54, 57 and 60 of Bihar Excise Amendment Act, 2016.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of 114 pouches of 200 ml. country made wine. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody already undergone, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52512 of 2016 (2) dt.13-12-2016 2/2 satisfaction of Shri Sushant Ranjan, learned Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, Patna, in connection with Chowk P.S. Case No. 180 of 2016 on the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) S.Ali/B.T.

U T