Suchit Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12525 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -217 Year- 2016 Thana -KHAIRA District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Suchit Yadav, Son of Chano Yadav.

2. Chano Yadav, Son of Late Bhuna Yadav, Both are resident of Village Panbharba, P.S. Khaira, District- Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-03-2017 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 504, 307 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. They are only members of the mob and allegation of assault is against other co-accused persons. It has further been submitted that land dispute is going on between the parties and, as such, the whole family members have been implicated in the present case. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts and circumstances stated above, let above named petitioners, in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12525 of 2017 (3) dt.28-03-2017 2/2 event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M, Jamui, in connection with Khaira P.S. Case no. 217 of 2016 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also subject to the conditions that (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available before the police as and when required. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T