Satish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20065 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2018 Thana- KARAI PARSURAI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Satish Kumar aged about 45 years S/O Raj Kumar Singh Yadav @ Raj Kumar Singh R/O Village- Sandh, P.S.- Karai Parsurai, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/S ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gagan Deo Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Earlier bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 10.09.2018 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 37757 of 2018 with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completing one year of Jail custody.

Petitioner seeks bail in Karai-Parsurai P.S. Case No. 20 of 2018 (Sessions Trial No. 467 of 2018) registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is in custody since 21.02.2018 and he has completed more than one year of Jail custody. Charge has also been framed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20065 of 2019(2) dt.03-04-2019 2/2 in this case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and considering the period of custody, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Karai-Parsurai P.S. Case No. 20 of 2018 (Sessions Trial No. 467 of 2018), in connection with ADJ-1st, Hilsa, Nalanda, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and conclude the same within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order of this Court.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U