Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43069/2016bail granted

Saryug Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2017-01-30Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43069 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3 Year- 2016 Thana -SANDESH District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Saryug Choudhary, Son of Late Devilal Choudhary, Resident of VillageSandesh, P.S.- Sandesh, District- Bhojpur (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sri Sunil Kumar Pandey (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 30-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 27.04.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. 10931 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 04.01.2016. The petitioner is old fatherin-law. The trial court was directed to expedite the trial and to conclude the same within nine months but the trial has not been concluded and in near further the trial is not likely to be concluded. There is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence and the petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

The learned A.P.P. submits that the petitioner was

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43069 of 2016 (5) dt.30-01-2017 2/2 given liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IX, Bhojpur at Ara, in connection with Sandesh P.S. Case No. 03 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U