Rameshwar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8378 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -130 Year- 2016 Thana -TIKAPATTI District- PURNIA ====================================================== Rameshwar Mahto, son of Chunnu Mahto, resident of Village- Goriar East Banarsi Chowk, P.S.- Tikapatti, District- Purnea. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Asha Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Tikapatti P.S. Case No. 130 of 2016 registered under Sections 341,323,326,307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to land dispute.

Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner is named accused and there is direct allegation against him. He also submits that the petitioner has repeatedly given 'dabia' blow on the head of the husband of the informant due to which he sustained severe injury.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8378 of 2017 (2) dt.28-02-2017 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the State, I do not feel inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for anticipatory bail is, therefore, rejected. (Arvind Srivastava, J) Prakash/- U T