Naseem Ansari @ Nasim Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20208 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2024 Thana- VIJAYEPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Naseem Ansari @ Nasim Ansari Son of Rajmuhammad Ansari Resident of village - Hubauliya, P.S.- Bhore, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Umashankar Prasad S/O- Ramsurat, R/O- vill- Gajipur, P.S.- Tamkuhi Raj, Dist- Kushinagar (U.P) ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Tooba Hera, Advocate Mr. Pratyush, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Despite valid service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of O.P. No. 2.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the F.I.R., it is alleged that the accused persons, including the petitioner, on the false pretext that they provided loans at low interest rates, took Rs.6,69,000/- cash and Rs.9,18,000/- through bank transfer from the informant. When informant demanded his money, the accused persons gave Rs.1,75,000/- only. It is also alleged that when informant demanded his rest amount, the accused persons threatened him

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20208 of 2026(3) dt.08-07-2026 2/3 with dire consequences.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to oblique motive. Further submission is that petitioner has not taken any amount from the informant. The dispute is with regard to monetary transaction and there is no specific date, time or place stated in the FIR with respect to when the alleged transaction has taken place. The primary allegation is against co-accused Bhola Ram, who has been granted regular bail by the learned Trial Court. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner has got one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail. Petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial. There is no chance of absconding of the petitioner or tampering with the evidence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and nature of dispute, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20208 of 2026(3) dt.08-07-2026 3/3 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Vijayepur P.S. Case No. 184 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) utkarsh/- U T