Patna High CourtCR. MISC./65776/2018bail granted

Pradeep Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-11-19Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.65776 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-241 Year-2018 Thana- CHANPATIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Pradeep Kumar Son of Rajendra Raut Resident of Village-Barohiya,Police Station Chanpatia,Distt.-West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajeet Kumar Bhardwaj For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Chaubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chanpatia P.S. Case No. 241 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 25(1-b)a and 26 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of one country made pistol and one live cartridges.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 09.06.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65776 of 2018(2) dt.19-11-2018 2/2 Judicial Magistrate-V, West Champaran, Bettiah, in connection with Chanpatia P.S. Case No. 241 of 2018, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U