Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39338 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -20 Year- 2016 Thana -GAYA GRP CASE District- GAYA ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar son of Rajendra Chaudhary, R/o Village- Andar Bairagi, P.S.-Delha, District-Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Gaya Rail P.S. Case No. 20 of 2016 registered for offences under sections 379 of 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation has been made that the petitioner snatched Rs. 6,000/- and tried to flee away, but he was arrested at the spot. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11th February 2016. Looking to the period of custody, let the petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39338 of 2016 (3) dt.19-09-2016 2/2 connection with Gaya Rail P.S. Case No. 20 of 2016, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be father/mother/wife/son of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail (iii) the petitioner would cooperate in the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds and (iv) the petitioner will report to Gaya Rail P.S. Case No. 20 of 2016 by 7th of every month at least for six months and in case of failure without any valid rhyme or reason, the bail of the petitioner will be treated to have been cancelled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T