Nanhe Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21108 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-350 Year-2022 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Nanhe Singh Son Of Banke Singh Resident Of Village- Paithanpatti P.SManjhagarh District Gopalganj 2.

Tribhuwan Singh Son Of Banke Singh Resident Of Village- Paithanpatti P.SManjhagarh District Gopalganj 3.

Pintu Singh Son Of Banke Singh Resident Of Village- Paithanpatti P.SManjhagarh District Gopalganj 4.

Banke Singh Son Of Late Sita Singh Resident Of Village- Paithanpatti P.SManjhagarh District Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar, Addl Public Prosecutor Mr AK Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 307/379/34 and other ancillary sections of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, petitioner no.1 and petitioner no.4 assaulted brother of the informant causing him head injury, petitioner no.3 and petitioner no.4 assaulted Pankaj Singh by knife and farsa. Accused persons also snatched gold chain of Pankaj Singh. Petitioner no.3 also assaulted brother of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21108 of 2023(2) dt.03-07-2023 2/2 informant causing fracture in his finger.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that doctor has found simple injuries except injury caused to brother of Pankaj Singh and there is no specific allegation that who caused grievous injury. In a petty dispute, free fight took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case.

Learned counsel for the State as well as the informant oppose the prayer for bail.

Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for bail of all the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks from today, let these petitioners, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in Manjhagarh Police Station Case No. 350 of 2022, PTN No. 4588 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T