← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5677/2020dismissed

Ram Yash Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2020-05-21Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5677 of 2020 ====================================================== Ram Yash Sharm, Son of Late Mukhlal Sharma, Resident of Village + P.O.- Mani, Police Station- Bikramganj, District- Rohtas, presently residing at A/29, Geeta Sadan, Road No. 2C, Sai Corporate Park, Adarsh Vihar Colony, Rukanpura, P.O.- B.V. College, P.S.- Rupaspur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar the District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram. 2.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

3.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms Bikramganj. 4.

The Circle Officer, Bikramganj.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondents :

Mr. Vivek Prasad, GP-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 21-05-2020 Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Vivek Prasad, learned counsel for the State via video conferencing.

2. The petitioner by way of filing the instant writ petition has prayed for quashing of the order dated 06.02.2020 passed by the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Bikramganj in Miscellaneous Case No.1 of 2019-20 whereby he has rejected the prayer of the petitioner to rectify the entry of Khata No. 195 by substituting it with Khata No.130A in the revenue records.

Patna High Court CWJC No.5677 of 2020 dt.21-05-2020 2/2

3. It is not disputed that against the order impugned a revision in terms of Section 8 of the Bihar Land Mutation Act, 2011 is maintainable.

4. In view of the disputed questions of fact raised in the writ petition as also in view of an equally efficacious statutory remedy of revision available to the petitioner for the redressal of his grievance, I am not inclined to entertain the instant writ petition in extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail of the statutory remedy of revision against the order impugned.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 21.05.2020 Transmission Date NA