← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1091/2014dismissed

Satyendra Kumar Shrivastava v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary Govt. Of Bihar And ORS.

2015-04-02Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1091 of 2014 ====================================================== Satyendra Kumar Shrivastava, Son of Late Deena Nath Prasad, resident of Shio Mandir Gali, Shekhpura, P.S.- Hawai Adda, Dist.- Patna .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Senior S.P. Patna

3. The S.P. Patna West Dist. - Patna

4. The Officer in Charge of Hawai Adda Police Station, Dist.- Patna

5. The I.O. Hawai Adda Police Station, Distt.- Patna

6. Kanti Mohan Sahay, Son of Surendra Nath Sahay, Resident of MohallaRamrekha Ghat, Chhoti Mathia Buxar, P.S.- Buxar (Town), Dist.- Buxar

7. Nawal Singh, Son of Mannu Singh

8. Renu Devi, Wife of Late Komal Lal

9. Monika Sahay Wife of Rahul Kumar All Resident of village- Chhoti Kopa, P.S.- Naubatpur, Dist.- Patna .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shambhu Sharan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, AC to GP-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 02-04-2015 The petitioner initially filed a complaint which was referred to the police pursuant to which Hawai Adda P.S. Case No. 164 of 2014 dated 9.8.2014 was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 448, 323, 341, 427, 504 and 379 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The grievance of the petitioner is that though the FIR was registered on 9th August, 2014 but the police failed to arrest any of the accused persons.

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1091 of 2014 (2) dt.02-04-2015 2 / 2 The instant case was filed before this Court on 19th November, 2014 and the affidavit was sworn on 14th November, 2014. Most of the offences alleged are bailable in nature. The application shows nothing but impatience on behalf of the petitioner as he wants arrest of the accused persons even before the police could ascertain as to whether they are, in any way, involved in the offence alleged or not.

I find no merit in this application. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U T