Rameshwar Sao v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.66982 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -152 Year- 2018 Thana -PHULWARISHARIF District- PATNA ====================================================== Rameshwar Sao Son of Late Khobhari Sao Resident of Village-Korji,P.O. + P.S.- Phulwari Sharif,Distt.-Patna (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Phulwari Sharif P.S. Case No.152 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased and is aged about 69 years.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has committed no offence and has been falsely implicated in this case. It has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name has been added in course of investigation. Petitioner is in custody since 26.06.2018.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66982 of 2018 (2) dt.26-11-2018 2/2 case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Judge-XV-cumA.C.J.M., Patna in connection with Phulwari Sharif P.S. Case No.152 of 2018, with following conditions :-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Sanjeev/- U T