Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Yadav @ Pinku Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27091 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-296 Year-2016 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== PAPPU KUMAR @ PAPPU YADAV @ PINKU KUMAR, (M), aged about 34 years, Son of Jehal Yadav @ Bindeshwar Yadav Resident of - Sujatpur, P.S.- Ghosi, District - Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Sanjiv Sharan, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Bishweshwar Ram, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody since 20.08.2018 in a case for the offence registered under Section 392 of the IPC.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the informant Suraj Prasad is driver of Vehicle No. BR-02AA-2733 belonging to one Lalan Kumar in the dead night of 18.12.2016 at Gaya Station four unknown miscreants came and took to Nawabganj. After reaching at the place of occurrence, near Village-Dhuriyari P.S. Makhdumpur on the point of revolver, they abused, assaulted him and after tying him with rope took away his vehicle and snatched Mobile, Driving License, etc. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27091 of 2019(2) dt.25-04-2019 2/2 petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. His name has come on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. There is no recovery of any incriminating article from possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has not been put on T.I. Parade. It is further submitted that the petitioner may be released on bail after completion of one year in custody. On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The petitioner has got criminal antecedent.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail after completion of one year in custody on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Jehanabad, in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 296 of 2016.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T