Sunil Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.65775 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -241 Year- 2017 Thana -WARISNAGAR District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Sunil Sahni Son of Ram Bahadur Sahni Resident of VillageLadaura,Police Station-Kalyanpur,Distt.-Samastipur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Murlidhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Warisnagar P.S. Case No. 241 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of snatching laptop bag and purse of the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Neither the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. nor the stolen article has been recovered from his possession. Similarly situated accused person has been granted bail vide order dated 24.07.2018 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 36302 of 2018 by another Co-ordinate Bench. Petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65775 of 2018 (2) dt.20-11-2018 2/2 is in custody since 14.02.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Warisnagar P.S. Case No. 241 of 2017 with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operative in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the Court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) sushma/- U T