Ashok Chaudhary @Ashok Kumar Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62959 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-501 Year-2018 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Ashok Choudhory @ Ashok Kumar Choudhary, Son of Late Ganesh Choudhary, Resident of Village/Mohalla- Gur Ki Mandi, Police StationAlamganj, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Spl. Case No. 8328 of 2018 arising out of Alamganj P.S. Case No. 501 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation against petitioner is of recovery of 75 litres Toddy from his possession.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 09.09.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62959 of 2018(2) dt.12-10-2018 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Patna, in connection with Spl. Case No. 8328 of 2018 arising out of Alamganj P.S. Case No. 501 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T