Vikash Kumar Dewedi @ Vikash Kumar Dwivedi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.40824 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -330 Year- 2014 Thana -FORBESGANJ District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Vikash Kumar Dewedi @ Vikash Kumar Dwivedi, Son of Bidya Sagar Dewedi @ Bidya Sagar Dwivedi resident of Village - Haldibari, P.S. - Haldibari, District - Koochbihar (West Bengal). .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhola Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madan Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-01-2016 Heard Sri Bhola Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Madan Kumar, learned A.P.P. The petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 330 of 2014 registered for the offence punishable under Section 406, 420, 468/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail. It has been alleged that petitioner was one of the conspirators alongwith other accused persons in defrauding the general people in a business of chit fund and learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in this case some of the accused persons against whom allegation was serious than the petitioner has already been granted bail by this court. He has specifically referred to Cr. Misc. No.43169 of 2014 whereby on 3.12.2014 one
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40824 of 2015 (3) dt.28-01-2016 2/2 of the co-accused namely Ajay Kumar Mandal @ Ajay Mandal who was alleged to be Bihar In-chare of Chit fund company has been granted bail Keeping in view the nature of accusation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail stands rejected.
However, if the petitioner appears before the court below within a period of six weeks from today and makes a prayer for regular bail the learned court below without being prejudiced with this order may examine the same and pass appropriate order considering particularly the fact that the other accused has been granted bail. The order may be passed preferably on the same date.
(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U T