Raj Kapoor Singh @ Raj Kapur Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21550 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2024 Thana- KATIHAR MUFFASIL District- Katihar ====================================================== Raj Kapoor Singh @ Raj Kapur Kumar Singh, Gender-Male, aged about 25 years, son of Late Ram Nihora Singh, Resident of Makarpur Police Station Sanhoula, District- Bhagalpur (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-08-2025 Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 218 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 64, 89, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the petitioner had threatened the informant to kill, who had relationship with the brother of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation of sexually

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21550 of 2025(3) dt.20-08-2025 2/3 exploiting the informant on the pretext of marriage is against the elder brother of the petitioner, who was having relationship with the informant. The allegation against the petitioner of threatening the informant is false and fabricated. Petitioner has clean antecedent. On these grounds, petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest bail.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Considering the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, the allegation of sexually exploiting the informant on the pretext of marriage is against the elder brother of the petitioner, who was having relationship with the informant. Petitioner has clean antecedent. I am of the opinion that petitioner has, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.

7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Katihar/ court concerned, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 218 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21550 of 2025(3) dt.20-08-2025 3/3 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. If any other case is pending against the petitioner as what has been stated in paragraph no. 3, this order will lose its force automatically. (Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U T