← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63032/2018bail granted

Nand Lal Rishidev And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63032 of 2018 (2) dt.12-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.63032 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -179 Year- 2018 Thana -NAUGACHIA District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Nand Lal Rishidev, Son of Late Bhagwat Rishidev,

2. Veer Kumar Rishidev, Son of Nand Lal Rishidev, Both Resident of Village- Musahani Patti, Ward No.-19, P.S.-Naugachhiya, DistrictBhagalpur. .... .... Petitioners/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners/s : Mr. Aditya Nath Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Parmanand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2018 The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Naugachiya P.S. Case No. 179 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 38(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 40 litres of liquor. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have falsely been implicated in this case and have no criminal antecedent and have been in judicial custody since 23.06.2018 and are ready to abide by any condition imposed on them for grant of bail.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63032 of 2018 (2) dt.12-10-2018 circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 02nd Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Excise, Bhagalpur, in connection with Naugachiya P.S. Case No. 179 of 2018, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioners again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T