Vinod Sahni @ Binod Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.66972 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -29 Year- 2018 Thana -ROSERA District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Vinod Sahni @ Binod Sahni Son of Late Narayan Sahni Resident of Lohiya Nagar,P.S. Supaul,Distt.-Supaul .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No.29 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379, 461, 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is stealing of mobile from the shop of informant which was recovered from the possession of petitioner.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the mobile which has been recovered from his possession belongs to him. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 30.01.2018.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66972 of 2018 (2) dt.26-11-2018 2/2 case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-Ist, Rosera, in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No.29 of 2018 with following conditions :-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Sanjeev/- U T