Patna High CourtCR. MISC./65482/2018dismissed

Rupesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-11-22Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.65482 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-173 Year-2018 Thana- DHARHARA District- Munger ====================================================== Rupesh Yadav Son of Late Jalo Yadav Resident of Village-Singhia,P.S. Naya Ram Nagar (Safiyabad),Distt.-Munger(Bihar),Pin-811202 ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dr. Chandra Shekhar Azad For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2018 Petitioner prays for bail in connection with Dharahra P.S.Case No. 173 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation as per FIR is that some miscreants intercepted the trucks of the informant and assaulted him by Danda and also snatched Rs.2000/- from his pocket and police came and arrested two accused persons, who have disclosed the name of the petitioner stating that petitioner fled away along with others from the place of occurrence. It further appears that petitioner is accused in 11 other cases also. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that on the basis of disclosure made by co-accused name of petitioner is transpired and except that there is nothing against him and petitioner is in custody for more than three months.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65482 of 2018(2) dt.22-11-2018 2/2 Heard learned APP for the State, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that petitioner has criminal antecedents and he is accused in 11 other cases.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances and also petitioner having criminal antecedents, I am not inclined to grant him bail.

However, since the petitioner is in custody, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial. With the above observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T