Md. Rahman v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16737 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -94 Year- 2016 Thana -SANOKHAR District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Md. Rahman, Son of late Md. Rahim, the Resident of Village-Mahmdabad, P.S.-Lodipur, Distt.-Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Swapnil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahmad Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 10-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is an accused in connection with Sanokhar P.S. Case No. 94 of 2016, registered under Sections 392 and 411 of Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur.

The accusation is that on 14.11.2016, one Chandan Yadav hired Scorpio vehicle of the informant for going to railway station, Bhagalpur in which Chandan Yadav, Md. Rahman (Petitioner) and one Dinbandhu Sharma boarded on the said vehicle. In course of returning from the railway station, in the way, all of them got down from the vehicle and at that time petitioner and Chandan Yadav pointed pistol on him and moved with the Scorpio. After some time, the vehicle of the informant was recovered by the Police. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16737 of 2017 (3) dt.10-05-2017 2/2 submits that petitioner has not been apprehended on the spot with the stolen vehicle and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner, above named, is rejected for the present.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T