Prem Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Districr Magistrate, Begusarai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.720 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- ====================================================== 1.

PREM KUMAR SINGH Son of Late Ramashish Sah Resident of Village - Barauni-01, P.O. and P.S.- Teghra, Distt.- Begusarai, Bihar 2.

Dilip Kumar Son of Late Ramashish Sah Resident of Village - Barauni-01, P.O. and P.S.- Teghra, Distt.- Begusarai, Bihar 3.

Kishore Kumar Son of Late Ramashish Sah Resident of Village - Barauni01, P.O. and P.S.- Teghra, Distt.- Begusarai, Bihar 4.

Moti Kumar Son of Late Ramashish Sah Resident of Village - Barauni-01, P.O. and P.S.- Teghra, Distt.- Begusarai, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DISTRICR MAGISTRATE, BEGUSARAI Bihar 2.

The District Magistreate cum Collector, Begusarai. Bihar 3.

The Sub - Divisional Magistrate, Teghra, Distt.- Begusarai. Bihar 4.

The Circle Officer, Teghra, Distt.- Begusarai. Bihar 5.

The Station House Officer, Teghra P.S., Distt.- Begusarai. Bihar 6.

Ramvilas Singh Son of Late Dhanusdhari Singh Nationality- Nepali Citizenb, Resident of Village - Janakpur Dham, Parikrama Road, Ward No.7, Police Chowki, P.S.- Janakpur, Distt.- Dhanusha, Nepal. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nikhil Kumar Agrawal For the Respondent/s :

Mr.M. Nasrul Huda Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that respondent no. 3, The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Teghra, District- Begusarai. Bihar, is still continuing with the proceeding under section 145 despite there being a finding that the father of the petitioner was in possession of the property in

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.720 of 2019(3) dt.21-02-2023 2/2 question and till date the same has not been concluded. In that view of the matter, without going into the merit of the case, respondent no. 3 is directed to conclude the proceeding of case No. 249M/2001 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) asmit/- U