Patna High CourtMJC/1841/2013dismissed

Ramesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-09-07Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1841 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6622 of 2012 ======================================================

1. Ramesh Kumar S/o Shri Laxman Prasad, Resident of Mohalla- Nai Bazar (Near Bari Maszid), P.O. + P.S- Chapra, P.S- Bhagwan Bazar, DistrictSaran.

2. Dilip Kumar S/o Shri Nagendra Singh, Resident of Village- Paitrapur, P.O- Mangourihar, P.S- Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Mr. Navin Kumar, the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Mr. Amit Subhani, the Principal Secretary Home Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. Mr. Jitendra Kumar, the Central Selection Board (Constable Recruitment) Pant Bhawan 4th Floor, Bailey Road, Patna-1

5. Mr. Sushil Kumar, the Director General of Police (B.M.P), Tirhut Range Muzaffarpur.

6. Mr. Abhyanand, the Director General of Police, Patna Range.

7. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, the Chairman, Police Recruitment Cell-cumSuperintendent of Police, Arrah.

8. Mr. Sujit Kumar, the Chairman, Police Recruitment Cell-cumSuperintendent of Police, Chapra.

9. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, the Chairman Police Recruitment Cell-cumSuperintendent of Police Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.K. Mishra, GP-22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-09-2015 Heard the parties.

CWJC No. 6622 of 2012 has been disposed of in terms of the Division Bench order passed in LPA No. 831 of 2009. The matter with regard to non-compliance of the Division Bench order came for consideration in contempt proceeding and the same has been dismissed.

Patna High Court MJC No.1841 of 2013 (3) dt.07-09-2015 2/2 In view of the Division Bench order, there is no need to proceed with the matter. In view of the order passed in MJC No. 871 of 2012, this application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U