← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21699/2026dismissed

Gautam Paswan @ Vicky Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-08Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21699 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2026 Thana- LAHERIMUHALLA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Gautam Paswan @ Vicky Paswan Son of Bijay Paswan R/o Village - Kathari, P.S.- Asthawan, District - Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No. 06 of 2026 registered for the offence under Section 310(2) of the BNS, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is the owner of the Scorpio Vehicle which was used in the loot. When the scorpio vehicle was recovered from then house of the Vijay Paswan, the petitioner was found fleeing away. Vijay Paswan has given his self-inculpatory statement saying that the owner of the vehicle was one Kunal Paswan and Gautam Paswan is brother of Kunal Paswan.

4. The petitioner is in custody since 1.7.2024.

5. Considering the allegation of committing loot

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21699 of 2026(3) dt.08-04-2026 2/2 and the materials available on record and the recovery of the Scorpio vehicle which was used in the loot, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

7. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U