Sunil Kumar @ Sri Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19103 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2017 Thana- PAROO District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Sunil Kumar @ Sri Sunil Kumar Son of Shivnath Paswan Resident of Village - Baijalpur, P.S.- Paroo, District - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Yugal Kishore, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case, in brief, is that this petitioner and other 9 persons have been appointed on false TET examination.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already been terminated from service in the year 2016. It has further been submitted that petitioner had applied for TET Examination and after receiving admit card appeared in the examination. It has further been submitted that after verification of document the petitioner has joined his service. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has not committed any offence at all.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19103 of 2019(4) dt.13-02-2020 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as nature of accusation, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bailbond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Muzaffarpur in Paroo P.S. Case No. 55 of 2017, on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) S.Katyayan/- U T