← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48944/2014rejected

Amit Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2015-04-30Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48944 of 2014 (2) dt.30-04-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48944 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -228 Year- 2013 Thana -AHIAPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Amit Kumar Singh Son of late Ram Sarowar Singh resident of village - Laxman Nagar P.S. - Gaighat, District - Muzaffarpur at present resident of Mohalla Ram Thakur Mohalla Ward np. (ii) P.S. - Ahiyapur, District - Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Murlidhar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 228 of 2012 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner being the husband of the informant's daughter started demanding a Maruti Car and rupees five lacs by way of dowry and due to non-fulfillment, tortured her and lastly the petitioner informed the informant that his daughter died and her last rites has already been performed and then the informant went there and found the house locked.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48944 of 2014 (2) dt.30-04-2015 Submission is of false implication and that never any dowry was demanded and as a matter of fact the wife of the petitioner died due to appendices and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration to which the learned APP opposes by submitting that within seven years of marriage informant's daughter was killed.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, this Court is not persuaded to grant the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, accordingly, his such prayer stands rejected. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T