Vishunu Shankar Roy v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22989 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2018 Thana- SIMRI District- Buxar ====================================================== Vishunu Shankar Roy, Male, aged about 42 years, S/O Late Shivmangal Roy, Resident of Village-Manikpur, P.S.-Simari, District-Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anant Kumar Bhaskar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Akbar Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 114, 302, 504 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. As per written report, there is specific allegation against Sunil Pandey of causing fire arm injury with rifle to the nephew of the informant, who sustained injury on his neck and died at the spot, who is in custody since 04.02.2019. The petitioner has no criminal history. There is case and counter case between them. The two co-accused have been granted regular bail by this Hon'ble Court vide Cr. Misc. 42676/2018 and 49022/2018 on 20.07.2018 and 25.09.2018 respectively.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22989 of 2019(3) dt.26-06-2019 2/2 petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Buxar in connection with Simari (T.R.H.O.P.), P.S. Case No. 101/2018, subject to the following conditions:
(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother brother, sister and/or his wife.
(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.
(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T