Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19555 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2018 Thana- KHIRI MORE District- Patna ====================================================== RANJEET KUMAR Son of Nand Lal Singh Resident of Village - Kharhekurha (Kadhe Kudha), P.S.- Khiri More, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Rajiv Nayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 02-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 302,120B IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act registered in connection with Khiri More P.S. Case No. 62/2018.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on mere suspicion and the petitioner is not named in the FIR. In the written report, the informant had raised suspicion only against other co-accused persons namely, Munna Kumar, Pappu Kumar, Indrajit Kumar and Jitendra Kumar. The petitioner's name has transpired in the extra judicial confessional statement of co-accused Munna Kumar, except which there is no other material to connect the petitioner with the alleged occurrence. There is no eye-witness to the occurrence. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.
4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM III, Danapur, District Patna, in connection with Khiri More P.S.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19555 of 2019(2) dt.02-04-2019 2/2 Case No. 62/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:
i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner. ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T