Patna High CourtMJC/2381/2009disposed

Raj Bansh Dubey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-03-20The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2381 of 2009 =========================================================== Raj Bansh Dubey son of late Chandra Deo Dubey, resident of village- Jagaria, P.S. Chainpur, District Kaimur (Bhabua).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through K.C. Saha son of not known, the Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariate,Patna.

2. Dr. B. Rajendra son of not known, the Director, Agriculture Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Mayank Barbare S/O not known, The District Magistrate, Kaimur, Bhabua.

4. Kumar Brijendra Prasad son of not known, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Bhabua.

5. Kishore Kumar son of Dr. Awadhesh Kr. Yadav, C.O. cum Block Development Officer, Adhaura.

6. Madan Mohan Prasad, son of not known, the Director, Provident Fund, Finance Department, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

7. R.M. Roy, S/O not known, the Treasury Officer, Secretariate Treasury, Sinchai Bhawan, Patna.

8. Md. Jamil S/O not known, The District Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas & Bhabhua.

9. I.S.D. Dhariwal, the Accountant General, Bihar, Veedchand Patel Path, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Bansh Dubey For the Respondent/s : Mr. Uday Prasad, AC to G.P. 22 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 20-03-2017 Considering the fact that the respondents have settled the claims of the petitioner by paying arrears of salary and pension as also other benefits like group insurance and provisional pension etc, no case for initiating a proceeding of contempt is made out. If the petitioner has any grievance still subsisting with regard to payment of group insurance and other monetary benefits to which he is entitled, he may claim the same in accordance with law by resorting to such proceedings as contemplated under law.

Patna High Court MJC No.2381 of 2009 dt.20-03-2017 2/2 For the present no case for initiating proceedings for contempt is made out. The application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner as indicated hereinabove.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) BTiwary/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 23-03-2017 Transmission Date