Sanjay Das @ Uday Kumar @ Uday Kumar Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.65303 of 2018 (Arising out of Cr.Misc. No.43237 of 2018) Arising Out of PS. Case No.- 82 Year-2018 Thana- District- Rosera, District-Samastipur ====================================================== Sanjay Das @ Uday Kumar @ Uday Kumar Das, S/o Ramavtar Das, R/o Vill.- Thahar, Basdhiya, P.S.- Rosera, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 16-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner seeks modification of order dated 01.08.2018 passed in Cr.Misc. No.43237 of 2018, by which bail was earlier granted to him in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No.82 of 2018, with one of the conditions that one of the bailors will be his father.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the father of the petitioner has declined to furnish bail bond in favour of the petitioner and, therefore, the said clause in the bail order may not be possible for the petitioner to furnish and he thus prays that the said clause be deleted. It is further submitted that in the modification petition it is specifically stated that the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65303 of 2018(2) dt.16-01-2019 2/2 petitioner is willing to furnish other sureties. In view of the practical difficulties and that the other conditions will be followed by the petitioner as undertaken by him, let the said Clause No.1 in the order dated 01.08.2018 be withdrawn.

The modification application stands disposed of accordingly.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Rakesh/PNM U T