Mithlesh Kumar Singh And ORS v. Sri R.K. Choudhary And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4814 of 2011 ===========================================================

1. Mithlesh Kumar Singh, S/o- Paras Nath Singh, resident of Village- Hasanpur, Nayatola, P.S. Sidhawalia, District- Gopalganj at present Shiksha Mitra, Upgraded Middle School, Balara, Anchal Barauli, P.S. Sidhawalia, DistrictGopalganj

2. Rinki Kumari, W/o- Punit Kumar Thakur, resident of Village- Hasanpur, Nayatola, P.S. Sidhawalia, District- Gopalganj at present Shiksha Mitra, Upgraded Middle School, Balara, Anchal Barauli, P.S. Sidhawalia, DistrictGopalganj

3. Kumari Kiran, W/o- Pramod Kumar, resident of Village- Hasanpur, Mathiya, P.S. Sidhawalia, District- Gopalganj at present Shiksha Mitra, Rajyakiya Primary School, Hasanpur, Mathiya, District- Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Sri R.K. Choudhary, the District Superintendent of Education, Gopalganj

2. Shashi Bhushan Mishra, the Block Development Officer, Barauli DistrictGopalganj

3. The Block Education Extension Officer, Barauli, District- Gopalganj Smt. Kamti Yadav

4. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shashi Shekhar Kumar Prasad, A.C. to PAAG-2 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 20-02-2017 This Court on 13th of September, 2010 in C.W.J.C. No. 11148 of 2010 set aside the order passed by the District Magistratecum-Collector, Gopalganj and ordered the restoration of the order of the Tribunal dated 30th of October, 2009. In pursuance of such order, the petitioners have been reinstated on 30th of September, 2010 and have been paid salary with effect from September, 2010 to October, 2011.

The grievance of the petitioners is that they have not

Patna High Court MJC No.4814 of 2011 dt.20-02-2017 2/2 been paid wages for the interregnum period i.e. from the date of termination till the date of reinstatement.

There is no order to pay salary for the said period either in the order passed by the Tribunal or by this Court on 13th of September, 2010. Thus, the order passed by this Court stands complied with. No further orders are called for in the present Contempt Petition. The same is, thus, disposed of. (Hemant Gupta, ACJ) P.K.P.

AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 23.02.2017 Transmission Date