← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23433/2024disposed

Raj Mahal Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-01Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23433 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-751 Year-2023 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

Raj Mahal Devi W/O Ramlal Ray Resident Of Village- Kushar Khas, Ward No. 10, P.S.-Mahua, District- Vaishali 2.

Vibha Kumari W/O Subhash Kumar Resident Of Village- Kushar Khas, Ward No. 10, P.S.-Mahua, District- Vaishali 3.

Subhash Kumar S/O Ramlal Ray Resident Of Village- Kushar Khas, Ward No. 10, P.S.-Mahua, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No. Ii For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners at the outset seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner no.3 Subhash Kumar.

3. Permission is accorded.

2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and have been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23433 of 2024(2) dt.01-05-2024 2/2 falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that specific allegation of assault is against Subhash Kumar and petitioners being mother and wife of Subhash came to be implicated in order to coerce Subhash into submission. It is also submitted that allegation of assault against the petitioners is general and omnibus in nature.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No.751/2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T