Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19589/2020bail granted

Md. Saddab @ Laddan v. The State Of Bihar

2020-10-14Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19589 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2019 Thana- PAROO District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== MD. SADDAB @ LADDAN Son of Mohammad Sabbir Alam Resident of Village - Kolhua, P.S.- Saraiya, Distt.- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. J.K.Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 14-10-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through video conference. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter shall be removed, and compliance with the conditions of the notices of this Court with regard to acceptance of e-filing shall be made, without delay immediately upon resumption of normal physical functioning of the Court, and in any event within one month thereof.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 15.11.2019 in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 168 of 2019 for the alleged offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with snatching of a motorcycle and cash from the informant and fleeing away after giving knife blow by the three accused persons. It is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name has surfaced in course of investigation. No specific overt act has been alleged against the petitioner and except suspicion there is no objective material to connect the petitioner with the alleged occurrence. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19589 of 2020(5) dt.14-10-2020 2/2 petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Learned APP refers to paras 29 and 30 of the case diary containing the statement of witnesses who allegedly saw the petitioner along with two other persons fleeing away. However, he has not shown any injury report in the case diary.

5. Be that as it may and having regard to the period of custody already suffered since 15.11.2019, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-III, Muzaffarpur in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 168 of 2019, if he is not otherwise required in any other case.

6. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T