← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1164/2019disposed

Devanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-03Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1164 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17820 of 2018 ====================================================== Lokesh Verma Son of Late Ram Swarup Prasad Resident at Survey no. 17/1, Ganesh Nagar, Ganesh Mandir, Dange Chauk, Thergaon, Pune City, Pune, State - Maharashtra, PIN code 411033.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri Deepak Kumar S/o not known Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar.

2.

Sri R.K.Mahajan Son of not known Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Magadh University, Bodh Gaya through its Registrar, Col. Pranav Kumar, S/o not known.

4.

Kritya Nand Paswan Son of not known Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

5.

Col. Pranav Kumar Son of not known Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dinesh Kumar, Advocate Ms. Sandhya Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt. Shilpa Singh (GA-12) Mrs. Abhanjali, AC to GA-12 For the Magadh University :

Mr. Sunit Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-07-2026 The Ld. Counsel for the parties jointly submit that the order of this Court dated 10.10.2018 passed in CWJC No. 17820 of 2018 has already stood complied with inasmuch as the father of the petitioner namely Late Ram Swaroop Prasad has been absorbed on the post of Lecturer in the Department of Psychology in R.L.S.Y. College, Aurangabad with effect from 09.05.1988 with consequential benefits, however it has been

Patna High Court MJC No.1164 of 2019(11) dt.03-07-2026 2/2 stated that payment shall be made after the funds are made available by the State Government.

2.

At this juncture, the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner be granted liberty to agitate his grievances with regard to payment of the consequential benefits, by taking recourse to the due process of law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The petition stands disposed of.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U