Akshay Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24485 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2021 Thana- DARBHANGA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Akshay Sharma Son of Raja Ram Sharma @ Raja Sharma Resident of Village - Ratnopatti, P.S. - Town, District - Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Girish Chandra Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 18-08-2022 Let the defect, if any, be removed within two weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 135 of 2021 lodged under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner is that he alongwith 3 persons have visited to the house of the informant at 10.00 p.m., they called the son of informant and took him. On the next day at about 06.00 a.m. the informant got information that his son was killed by multiple injuries of knife on his neck.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24485 of 2022(2) dt.18-08-2022 2/2 no eye witness in this case. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 21.06.2021, chargesheet has already been filed, it has also been submitted that there are 3 criminal cases pending against the present petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner assures to this Court that petitioner is ready to fulfill all the conditions, whatsoever, it may be imposed upon the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner is not a man of clean antecedent, rather there are 3 cases are pending against him. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present, but he may renew his prayer for bail after 1 year of framing of charge.

With this observation, the bail application stands rejected.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) ritik/- U T