Md. Ainullah @ Laddan Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16401 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -68 Year- 2016 Thana -BARURAJ District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Md. Ainullah @ Laddan Ansari, Son of Maimul Haque, Resident of Village Khiru Chhapra, P.S. Baruraj District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

The petitioner prays for anticipatory bail in connection with Baruraj P.S. case no. 68 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 376, 498A and other sections of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that general and omnibus allegation is levelled against the petitioner. It is further submitted that so far allegation under Sections 376, 511 of Indian Penal Code is concerned, informant has stated that all accused persons have tried to commit rape. Moreover, the case has been compromised between the parties and the husband of the informant has already been granted anticipatory bail by a

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16401 of 2017 (2) dt.08-04-2017 2/2 co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides. In view of the fact that this is a case under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code and parties have already compromised the case out of the court, the anticipatory bail application of petitioner is allowed and he, in the event of arrest/ surrender before the court below within four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri A.K. Singh, J.M. 1st class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Baruraj P.S. case no. 68 of 2016 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a condition that bailors should be the local one having sufficient property within the jurisdiction of learned court below and with further condition that petitioner shall cooperate and assist in the investigation of the case and if he fails to assist the investigating officer, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) rinkee/- U T