Indra Dev Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22865 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-339 Year-2025 Thana- HULASGANJ District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.
Indra Dev Yadav S/o Late Baudhu Yadav 2.
Ram Pravesh Yadav S/o Late Baudhu Yadav 3.
Vikash Yadav S/o Raj Bal Yadav @ Raj Balav Yadav All Residents of village - Jagua Bigha, P.S - Hulasganj, District - Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-04-2026 Heard Mr.Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail, who are in custody since 01.02.2026 in connection with Hulasganj P.S.Case No.339 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 11.10.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 125, 303(2), 352, 351(2) of BNS, 2023.
3. Specific allegation of assaulting with lathi and danda is attributed against the petitioners on the informant and others in which informant parties sustained injured.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners
2/4 submits that due to previous land dispute the present occurrence had taken place and there is case and counter case. Although the petitioners are named in the FIR but from a bare perusal of the FIR it appears that the FIR is in two parts. In 1st part, there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including the petitioners and in 2nd part, there is specific allegation of assault attributed against petitioner No.3 Vikash Yadav that he has assaulted to one Rinku Devi but the injury report of Rinku Devi suggests hat the injury is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance and the petitioners are in custody since 01.02.2026.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners and submits that petitioner No.1 carries three more cases, out of three more cases, he is on bail in two cases and rest one case is pending for consideration before the competent court of law, petitioner No.2 carries one more case other than the present one and he is on bail in the said case and petitioner No.3 carries two more cases other than the present one, out of two cases, he is on bail in one case and rest one case is pending for consideration before the competent court of law, as mentioned in paragraph-3 of the bail petition.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits
3/4 that all the aforesaid cases, as mentioned in paragraph-3 of the bail petition, lodged by the present informant's side against the present petitioners.
7. Considering the aforesaid fact, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Hulasganj P.S.Case No.339 of 2025, with the following conditions:- (I) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (II) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the
4/4 acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T