Gopal Chaudhry v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38271 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -105 Year- 2016 Thana -NARHAT District- NAWADA ====================================================== Gopal Chaudhry, S/o late Baleshwar Chaudhary, R/o VillageShankarbigha, P.S. Sitamarhi, District Nawada. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Smt Sangeeta Sharma (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 30-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Narhat (Sitamarhi) P.S Case No. 105 of 2016 (S.Tr. No. 399 of 2016) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 324 & 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the petitioner with an intention to kill the informant gave pasuli blow on the back side of the neck of the informant, causing cut injury and again repeated the blow which was caught by left hand, resulting, fingers were cut and bleeding started.

Submission is of false implication and that there is no such occurrence, as a matter of fact, there was illicit

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38271 of 2016 (2) dt.30-09-2016 2/2 relationship with the wife of the petitioner and the informant was trying to flee away, then he fell down and received injury, to which learned A.P.P. seriously opposes by submitting that the petitioner has caused injury on the vital part of the body and again he repeated blow.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, at present, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly, his such prayer stands rejected. However, let the trial be expedited and concluded as early as possible preferably with six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which if the petitioner is at no fault he may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T