← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/20228/2014disposed

Arti Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2022-12-07Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20228 of 2014 ====================================================== Arti Devi, Wife of Dinesh Kumar Gupta, Resident of Village- Rosan, P.O.- Rosan, P.S.- Rajpur, District- Buxar ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The District Magistrate, Buxar.

3.

The District Programme Officer, Buxar.

4.

The Child Development Project Officer, Rajpur, Buxar. 5.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat, Rasen, P.S.- Rajpur, District- Buxar. 6.

The Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Rasen, P.S.- Rajpur, District- Buxar. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Om Prakash Upadhyay, Adv.

Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Purnendu Singh, GP-27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 07-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner's claim is that upon her selection as Anganbari Sevika for Centre No. 121 in Rasen Village of District Buxur by selection letter dated 04.09.2013, bearing Memo No. 08, as contained in Annexure-1 series to the writ petition, she has not been allowed to discharge the duties of Sevika, and in this connection, she has made an application to the District Magistrate, Buxur at the District Janta Darbar on 10.07.2014, receipt of the application is Annexure-2 to the writ petition. The grievance is that, in spite of such application, no

Patna High Court CWJC No.20228 of 2014(2) dt.07-12-2022 2/2 remedial action has been taken. In view of the nature of grievance and the issue pending before the District Magistrate, Buxur at present, this Court is not called upon to adjudicate any issue as decision has to be taken by the District Magistrate, Buxur (Respondent No. 2).

Writ application is accordingly disposed of with the direction to Respondent No. 2 to pass final orders on the petitioner's grievance, noted above, within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) Raj kishore/- U