Dinesh Singh @ Dinesh Kr.Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21696 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2021 Thana- DARIHAT District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

DINESH SINGH @ DINESH KR.SINGH son of Late Bramdev Singh Resident of Village and P.O. and P.S. - Darihat, District - Rohtas. 2.

Arti Devi wife of Dinesh Singh Resident of Village and P.O. and P.S. - Darihat, District - Rohtas.

3.

Ravi Kumar Son of Dinesh Singh Resident of Village and P.O. and P.S. - Darihat, District - Rohtas.

4.

Soni Kumari Daughter of Dinesh Singh Resident of Village and P.O. and P.S. - Darihat, District - Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-09-2022 At the outset of argument learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition of petitioner No.1.

Prayer is allowed.

This anticipatory bail petition is dismissed as withdrawn against petitioner No.1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

Petitioners No., 2 to 4 apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 307, 379 and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21696 of 2022(2) dt.05-09-2022 2/2 some other ancillary Sections of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, petitioner No.3 assaulted the wife of informant with iron rod and petitioners No.2 and 4 assaulted her with fists and slaps.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the case. There is case and counter case in which both sides sustained injuries. The injuries are reported to be simple in nature. Petitioners have got clean antecedent. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts of the case and clean antecedent of the petitioners, let the petitioners No. 2 to 4, above named, in the event of their arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Dehri, Rohtas in connection with Darihat PS case No. 189/ 2021, subject to conditions laid down u/s 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. BKS/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T