← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13900/2015dfd for non appearance

Rajesh Kumar v. The Managing Director, Central Ware Housing Corporation And ORS

2023-08-22Mr. Justice A. Abhishek Reddy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13900 of 2015 ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar son of late Sumiran Sah Resident of Gudari Bazar, Ward no. 24 ,Samastipur P.s Samastipur, District Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Managing Director, Central Ware Housing Corporation and Ors 2.

The General ManagerCommandant Central Ware-Housing Corporation, New Delhi.

3.

The Regional Manager, Central Ware-Housing Corporation , Regional Office, Maurya Lok Complex, Block 4.

The Area Manager Central Ware Housing Corporation , Samastipur at samastipur.

5.

The Area Manager, Central Ware Housing Corporation , Darbhanga at Darbhanga.

6.

The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Food Corporation of India, Barah Khambha Road, New Delhi.

7.

The Executive Director , East Zone, Food Corporation of India, Millington Road, Kolkata.

8.

The General Manager, Regional Food Corporation of India ,Arunachal Building Exhibition Road, Patna.

9.

The General managerLaw Food Corporation of India, Patna. 10.

The Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, district office Samastipur. 11.

The Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, district office Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Deepak Sahay Jamuar, Adv.

For the CWHC :

Mr. Deepak Sahay Jamuar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 22-08-2023 This matter was called on 12.07.2023 and 09.08.2023 and has been specifically posted under the caption 'For Orders' as there was no representation on behalf of learned counsel for petitioner.

Even today, there is no representation on behalf of

Patna High Court CWJC No.13900 of 2015(5) dt.22-08-2023 2/2 learned counsel for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present writ petition. Having regard to the same, the matter is dismissed for default.

(A. Abhishek Reddy , J) gauravkr/- U