Manohar Lal v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19804 of 2014 ====================================================== Manohar Lal S/o Late Ram Lakhan Rai Resident of Village Hardaspur Diyara, P.S. Bakhtiyarpur, District Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, I.C.D.S., Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Patna.

4. The District Programme Officer, Patna.

5. The Child Development Project Officer Bakhtiyarpur, District Patna.

6. The Block Development Officer, Bakhtiyarpur, District Patna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ashok Kumar Chaudhary, AAG-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 10-12-2015 Heard Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Ashok Kumar Chaudhary, learned Additional Advocate General No.13, appearing for the respondents.

After some arguments, Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application, made, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, with liberty to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as

Patna High Court CWJC No.19804 of 2014 (2) dt.10-12-2015 2/2 may be permissible.

No objection has been raised the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present writ petition. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U