Vikky Kumar @ Vikky Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22908 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1689 Year-2018 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE District- Vaishali ====================================================== Vikky Kumar @ Vikky Kumar Paswan Son Of Late Ram Naresh Paswan Village Kumhar Madhopur Ps Jandaha, Dist- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
Sushma Kumari Wife Of Vikky Kumar, D/O- Baleshwar Paswan Village Bajithpur Thana Desari, Dist- Vaishali.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Surendra Kishore Thakur, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nand Kumar, APP For the complainant : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Tiwary, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22908 of 2023(2) dt.24-06-2023 2/3 petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court in connection with Complaint Case No. 1689 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The petitioner is directed to co-operate during the trial. If the petitioner does not co-operate during the trial, the Court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement. In case, any such
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22908 of 2023(2) dt.24-06-2023 3/3 application is made by either of the parties, the Court below shall refer the matter to the District Mediation Centre. (Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T