Brajesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30655 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-198 Year-2020 Thana- CHAUSA District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.

BRAJESH YADAV S/o Shatrughan Yadav Resident of Village- Bhatgama, P.S.- Chausa, District- Madhepura.

2.

Niraj Yadav @ Chhoto Yadav S/o Shatrughan Yadav Resident of VillageBhatgama, P.S.- Chausa, District- Madhepura. 3.

Suman Yadav S/o Shatrughan Yadav Resident of Village- Bhatgama, P.S.- Chausa, District- Madhepura.

4.

Mithun Yadav S/o Viveka Yadav Resident of Village- Bhatgama, P.S.- Chausa, District- Madhepura.

5.

Akhilesh Yadav S/o Viveka Yadav Resident of Village- Bhatgama, P.S.- Chausa, District- Madhepura.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amarnath Singh, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Bibhuti Narayan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-03-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehend their arrest in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No. 198 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 384, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and U/s 27 of the Arms Act.

As per allegation, five accused persons named in the FIR

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30655 of 2021(2) dt.29-03-2022 2/2 including the petitioners along with 10-15 unknown persons assaulted the informant. They fired on him but he was saved. They taken away his gold chain, wrist watch etc. The reason behind the occurrence is that they were demanding rangdari from the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that both the parties are co-villagers and the entire allegation is false and frivolous. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances as well as the clean antecedents of the petitioners, let the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Udakishunganj in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No. 198 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) SONALI/- U T