Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19909/2020rejected

Raja Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2020-10-12Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19909 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-674 Year-2019 Thana- KANTI THARMAL POWER DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== Raja Sah, age about 35 years, Male, Son of Ram Vinod Sah Resident of Village - Berai, P.S.- Hathauri, District - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Nityanand, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 12-10-2020 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 674 of 2020 for the offence under Sections 363, 365 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently, Sections 392, 394, 411, 302, 201 and 120(B) of the IPC were also added.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 19.12.2019. He submits that actually, the case was registered under Sections 363, 365 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and later on, Sections 392, 394, 411, 302, 201 and 120(B) of the IPC were also added.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19909 of 2020(4) dt.12-10-2020 2/2 In this case, case diary was called for vide order 18.06.2020.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not named in the FIR and nothing was recovered from his possession.

Considering the materials available on record, the Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Prayer for bail is rejected.

However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within a period of six months from today. In the event the trial is not concluded within the stipulated period, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) BT/- U T