Sogarath Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16655 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -34 Year- 2016 Thana -DANDARI District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Sogarath Mandal S/o Late Ram Swarop Mandal, R/o Bank, P.S. Dandari, Distt. - Begusarai .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-04-2017 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dandari P.S. Case No. 34 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 420, 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation as per FIR is against Shervan Kumar and Shervan Mandal that they have fraudulently withdrawn the insurance money of the informant on basis of forged document, showing him dead.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is father of Shervan Mandal and he has no concern with the present case and his complicity has only been shown as he is father of Shervan Mandal.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16655 of 2017 (2) dt.11-04-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the aforesaid facts that there is no allegation against the petitioner rather he is father of Shervan Mandal, as such, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-III, Begusarai, in connection with Dandari P.S. Case No. 34 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Ravi/- U T