Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21156/2020dismissed

Binod Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2020-06-29Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21156 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-235 Year-2019 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== BINOD MAHTO Son of Nawab Mahto Resident of Village - Bhelwa, P.S.- Madhuban, District - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 29-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through video conference. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter shall be removed, and compliance with the conditions of the notices of this Court with regard to acceptance of e-filing shall be made, without delay immediately after the lockdown ends, and in any event within one month thereof.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 427 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 235 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with assault with Farsa blow on the head of the informant's son Rajnish Patel. It is submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21156 of 2020(2) dt.29-06-2020 2/2 the informant had taken money for supplying bricks to the petitioner, but failed to do so. The FIR has been filed with a view to grab the money. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Learned APP appears and opposes the bail petition, inviting reference to the impugned order. The injury of the informant's son has been taken note of which is said to have been caused by sharp weapon and is of grievous nature.

5. Having regard to the nature of accusations and gravity of offence alleged, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.

6. Office shall ensure that all defects have been removed and compliance with the notices of this Court has been made, within the stipulated time as provided in para 1 hereinabove.

(Vikash Jain, J) HR/- U T